The 1982 Movie Poltergeist: The Controversial Use of Real Skeletons
The 1982 film Poltergeist, directed by Tobe Hooper and produced by Steven Spielberg, is a classic in the horror genre. Known for its chilling narrative about a suburban family haunted by malevolent spirits, Poltergeist also gained notoriety for an unsettling reason: the use of real skeletons during its production. This article explores the implications of this choice, its historical context, and the impact it had on the film and its legacy.
Table of Contents
The Controversial Choice
Real Skeletons on Set
During the filming of Poltergeist, the production team opted to use real human skeletons for certain scenes, particularly in the infamous pool scene where the character Diane Freeling, played by JoBeth Williams, confronts a horde of skeletal remains. At the time, using real skeletons was not as uncommon as it is today, primarily due to the lower costs associated with procuring actual bones compared to creating lifelike replicas.
A Cost-Saving Measure
Reportedly, the decision to use real skeletons was partly a cost-saving measure. At the time, high-quality replicas were expensive to produce, and acquiring real skeletons was more financially feasible for the production team. The skeletons were obtained from a medical supply company, which was a common practice for films during that era.
The Backlash
Ethical Concerns
The decision to use real skeletons raised significant ethical questions. Many found the practice disrespectful to the deceased and their families, as it trivialized the sanctity of human remains for the sake of entertainment. This controversy contributed to a broader conversation about the ethical implications of using real human remains in film and theater.
Impact on the Cast and Crew
The revelation that real skeletons were used reportedly affected the cast and crew. JoBeth Williams, who was unaware of the skeletons being real during filming, expressed discomfort upon learning the truth. Such concerns prompted discussions about the responsibilities of filmmakers regarding the use of human remains in their work.
The Legacy of Poltergeist
Cultural Impact
Despite the controversy, Poltergeist remains a beloved horror classic, recognized for its groundbreaking special effects and memorable performances. The film has influenced countless other horror movies and established itself as a staple of the genre.
Ongoing Discussions
The use of real skeletons in Poltergeist continues to be a topic of discussion among film enthusiasts, historians, and ethicists. It serves as a cautionary tale about the balance between artistic vision and ethical considerations in filmmaking. The incident has prompted filmmakers to reconsider their practices, particularly as audiences become more aware of and sensitive to issues surrounding representation and respect for human remains.
FAQs About Poltergeist and the Use of Real Skeletons
1. Why did Poltergeist use real skeletons?
The production team used real skeletons as a cost-saving measure, as creating high-quality replicas was more expensive at the time.
2. Were the actors aware that the skeletons were real?
Many actors, including JoBeth Williams, were reportedly unaware that the skeletons were real during filming. The revelation later caused discomfort among the cast.
3. Did the use of real skeletons affect the film’s reception?
While it sparked controversy, the film’s overall reception remained strong, and it has since become a classic in the horror genre.
4. What ethical concerns arose from using real skeletons?
Using real human remains raised questions about respect for the deceased and their families, as well as the appropriateness of using such remains for entertainment purposes.
5. How has the industry changed since Poltergeist?
In the years since Poltergeist, there has been a greater awareness of ethical considerations regarding the use of human remains in film. Many filmmakers now prioritize the use of replicas and other alternatives.
Conclusion
The use of real skeletons in Poltergeist is a striking example of the complexities involved in filmmaking, blending creativity with ethical dilemmas. While the film remains a landmark in horror cinema, the controversy surrounding its production serves as a reminder of the importance of respecting the dignity of human life and the legacies of those who have passed. As audiences continue to engage with this classic film, the discussions it inspires reflect an evolving understanding of ethics in the arts.
